<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cost of War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/21/the-cost-of-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/21/the-cost-of-war/</link>
	<description>Estd. in Ireland, July 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:42:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/21/the-cost-of-war/comment-page-1/#comment-85535</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/21/the-cost-of-war/#comment-85535</guid>
		<description>Somewhat surprised Weisman’s article left many gasping about the amount of money spent thus far.    An equal number share a pang of anger that so many are in fact gasping.  One can easily equate us to a teenager set loose with dad’s credit card only to be slapped with reality when the bill arrives.  In this case its our credit card … and this war is hardly a secret.

Despite a few flaws with the fatuous figures quoted, numerous issues and debates should arise from this information. Political agendas aside, this specific comment isolates a singular component of the article regarding money spent. 
To spend that much ‘treasure’ on any one given project outside our natural boundaries is a tad bit exorbitant and almost impossiblel to get a detailed accounting.   

“Why buy a pint when you can get a keg,” seems to be our new philosophy on spending.

Meanwhile, some of us out of school for the past five years still owe a balance of $65,000 for our student loans.  There has to be new methods of attainment to obtain harmony and new priorities in spending   …. I would suggest investing in the future along the lines of secondary education as the first step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhat surprised Weisman’s article left many gasping about the amount of money spent thus far.    An equal number share a pang of anger that so many are in fact gasping.  One can easily equate us to a teenager set loose with dad’s credit card only to be slapped with reality when the bill arrives.  In this case its our credit card … and this war is hardly a secret.</p>
<p>Despite a few flaws with the fatuous figures quoted, numerous issues and debates should arise from this information. Political agendas aside, this specific comment isolates a singular component of the article regarding money spent.<br />
To spend that much ‘treasure’ on any one given project outside our natural boundaries is a tad bit exorbitant and almost impossiblel to get a detailed accounting.   </p>
<p>“Why buy a pint when you can get a keg,” seems to be our new philosophy on spending.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, some of us out of school for the past five years still owe a balance of $65,000 for our student loans.  There has to be new methods of attainment to obtain harmony and new priorities in spending   …. I would suggest investing in the future along the lines of secondary education as the first step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

