<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The John O&#8217;Donoghue files (Part 3 &#8211; Berlin)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/08/20/the-john-odonoghue-files-part-3-berlin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/08/20/the-john-odonoghue-files-part-3-berlin/</link>
	<description>Estd. in Ireland, July 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:42:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcollins</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/08/20/the-john-odonoghue-files-part-3-berlin/comment-page-1/#comment-866518</link>
		<dc:creator>mcollins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=4811#comment-866518</guid>
		<description>I recall, during the Rody Molloy flights controversy, that one of the points made was about possible tax consequences if an employer paid for a spouse to accompany an employee on a trip where the spouse’s presence was not necessary for business purposes.   The Revenue Commissioners were quoted as saying that benefit-in-kind tax could apply to flight tickets used by the spouse of a business person under some circumstances. But a spokesman said it would depend on whether the spouse was taking part in business activities — such as attending a conference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So where does this leave John O’Donoghue, whose wife seems to have been paid for (by you and me) to accompany him on all his overseas junkets?  I have no doubt the Revenue Commissioners are onto this already…..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall, during the Rody Molloy flights controversy, that one of the points made was about possible tax consequences if an employer paid for a spouse to accompany an employee on a trip where the spouse’s presence was not necessary for business purposes.   The Revenue Commissioners were quoted as saying that benefit-in-kind tax could apply to flight tickets used by the spouse of a business person under some circumstances. But a spokesman said it would depend on whether the spouse was taking part in business activities — such as attending a conference.</p>
<p>So where does this leave John O’Donoghue, whose wife seems to have been paid for (by you and me) to accompany him on all his overseas junkets?  I have no doubt the Revenue Commissioners are onto this already…..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toratoratora</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/08/20/the-john-odonoghue-files-part-3-berlin/comment-page-1/#comment-863828</link>
		<dc:creator>toratoratora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=4811#comment-863828</guid>
		<description>@ John Jones - Not sure if that comment was meant to be sarcastic, but if it was genuine, then it pretty much encapsulates one of the big problems with this country, and why we are in such shit.  

Ah sure, he may be ripping us off left right and center, and tearing the arse out of his expenses.  But in fairness he&#039;s great craic, a decent old skin, sure he bought me a pint, and we had a great oul sing song at his car later on.  Sure, they&#039;re all at the strokes, there&#039;s worse he could be doing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ John Jones &#8211; Not sure if that comment was meant to be sarcastic, but if it was genuine, then it pretty much encapsulates one of the big problems with this country, and why we are in such shit.  </p>
<p>Ah sure, he may be ripping us off left right and center, and tearing the arse out of his expenses.  But in fairness he&#8217;s great craic, a decent old skin, sure he bought me a pint, and we had a great oul sing song at his car later on.  Sure, they&#8217;re all at the strokes, there&#8217;s worse he could be doing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/08/20/the-john-odonoghue-files-part-3-berlin/comment-page-1/#comment-863805</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=4811#comment-863805</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know when Johno is back in Ireland?
I met up with him in Cheltenham in 07 and he is great craic. 
The driver he had with him that day had a guitar and there was a mini sing song at the Merc. 
Does Terry Gallagher sing and play the guitar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know when Johno is back in Ireland?<br />
I met up with him in Cheltenham in 07 and he is great craic.<br />
The driver he had with him that day had a guitar and there was a mini sing song at the Merc.<br />
Does Terry Gallagher sing and play the guitar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romano</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/08/20/the-john-odonoghue-files-part-3-berlin/comment-page-1/#comment-863689</link>
		<dc:creator>Romano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=4811#comment-863689</guid>
		<description>Great work, hopefully this will see his resignation, or am I thinking of a person who has honour?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work, hopefully this will see his resignation, or am I thinking of a person who has honour?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libero</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/08/20/the-john-odonoghue-files-part-3-berlin/comment-page-1/#comment-863684</link>
		<dc:creator>Libero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=4811#comment-863684</guid>
		<description>(Shamelessly lifted from He3 on Politics.ie)

&quot;First he takes Cheltenham
Then he takes Berlin&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Shamelessly lifted from He3 on Politics.ie)</p>
<p>&#8220;First he takes Cheltenham<br />
Then he takes Berlin&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/08/20/the-john-odonoghue-files-part-3-berlin/comment-page-1/#comment-863671</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=4811#comment-863671</guid>
		<description>Haymoon, they are PDF files, and anyone can download them.
http://www.scribd.com/people/documents/11418994-gavin-sheridan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haymoon, they are PDF files, and anyone can download them.<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/people/documents/11418994-gavin-sheridan" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/people/documents/11418994-gavin-sheridan</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haymoon</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/08/20/the-john-odonoghue-files-part-3-berlin/comment-page-1/#comment-863670</link>
		<dc:creator>Haymoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=4811#comment-863670</guid>
		<description>You have gone to a lot of trouble with this.  It would have been better if you had saved docs as pdf files. They would be more easily accessed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have gone to a lot of trouble with this.  It would have been better if you had saved docs as pdf files. They would be more easily accessed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

