More NAMA stuff

Two good articles by IT journalists over the weekend.

First up, Simon Carswell, via FoI:

THE INTERNATIONAL Monetary Fund (IMF) told the Government that the definition of “long-term economic value” on bank loans in the draft Nama Bill was “masterful” as it was “sufficiently specific” and “sufficiently vague” to allow “appropriate flexibility”.

Steven Seelig, an adviser at the IMF, made the comments in an e-mailed response to a request by the Department of Finance for his opinion on the draft National Asset Management Agency Bill published last August.

“It is both sufficiently specific and sufficiently vague to allow appropriate flexibility. I hope you can retain this language,” said Mr Seelig, an expert on “bad banks”, in a private e-mail to department officials sent on August 25th.

The e-mail was among records released to The Irish Times under the Freedom of Information Act relating to representations made to the department on Nama.


And Laura Slattery, also via FoI
:

THE NATIONAL Asset Management Agency (Nama) should be required to register with the Land Registry or the Registry of Deeds, Minister for Finance Brian Lenihan has been advised.

In correspondence released to The Irish Times under the Freedom of Information Act, the Law Society of Ireland and the Property Registration Authority both expressed concern about the exemption for Nama assets to register in the Land Registry or the Registry of Deeds.

The society wrote to Mr Lenihan in September to say “normal conveyancing practice” should not be disrupted by Nama and that the agency should be required to register its interest in a land bank or property title.

The Property Registration Authority said the exemption for Nama assets to register “would appear to run counter to public policy and the necessity of transparency and reliability in land registers”.

Registration on a State register “provides clarity and certainty”, John Coleman, chairman of the Property Registration Authority, wrote to the Department of Finance. Other letters written to Mr Lenihan expressing concerns about the workings of Nama included a note from Bernard Allen TD, chairman of the Committee of Public Accounts.

I will be seeking copies of these FoI in my own future FoIs.

2 Responses to “More NAMA stuff”

  1. Registering the citizens interest in the toxic assets would make it more difficult to facilitate reinstating them back to their original owners( in the fullness of time.)
    They are hardly going to be sold off to some Chinese builders/ investors while Fianna Fail’s own crony developers languish their time away, playing golf in Marbella?
    This will be a replay of the Larry Goodman Saga.He went horrifically bust once upon a time remember?
    Now his son is running his re-invigorated empire.!
    Some things never change in Ireland (-besides Butterkrust bread)
    There will be a flock of Phoenix from ashes-like rebirths, of Dodo developers during the coming years.Read my
    lips.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP4x8uyEfmE

  2. Tech Gadget says:

    Chinese builders are not good buddy.