<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gavin&#039;s Blog &#187; Film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gavinsblog.com/category/film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com</link>
	<description>Estd. in Ireland, July 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 22:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rita Hayworth &#8211; Bewitched</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2008/07/07/rita-hayworth-bewitched/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2008/07/07/rita-hayworth-bewitched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=3230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rita doing her thang. The movie Pal Joey with Frank Sinatra was on over the weekend. Great stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Uz8qRsqoBLc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Uz8qRsqoBLc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Rita doing her thang. The movie Pal Joey with Frank Sinatra was on over the weekend. Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2008/07/07/rita-hayworth-bewitched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloverfield</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2007/07/05/cloverfield/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2007/07/05/cloverfield/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2007/07/05/cloverfield/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The trailer everyone is talking about (filmed on a phone in a movie theatre). Everytime it&#8217;s uploaded to Youtube, Paramount order a takedown. Yes that&#8217;s the head of the Statue of Liberty at the end. Poor quality I know, but these videos are hard to find. Dailymotion still have it: ClovrField TTUploaded by anil31]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><del datetime="2007-07-05T01:27:50+00:00">The trailer everyone is talking about (filmed on a phone in a movie theatre). </del>Everytime it&#8217;s uploaded to Youtube, Paramount order a takedown. </p>
<p>Yes that&#8217;s the head of the Statue of Liberty at the end. Poor quality I know, but these videos are hard to find. </p>
<p>Dailymotion still have it:</p>
<div><object width="425" height="335"><param name="movie" value="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/5LIzvaJAGOBnhhlgH"></param><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/5LIzvaJAGOBnhhlgH" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="335" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br /><b><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2glav_clovrfield-tt">ClovrField TT</a></b><br /><i>Uploaded by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/anil31">anil31</a></i></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2007/07/05/cloverfield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Das Leben der Anderen</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2007/06/29/das-leben-der-anderen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2007/06/29/das-leben-der-anderen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2007/06/29/das-leben-der-anderen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to see it last night. One word. Stunning.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lives_of_Others">I went to see it last night.</a> One word. </p>
<p>Stunning. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2007/06/29/das-leben-der-anderen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Damon as Captain Kirk?</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/08/03/matt-damon-as-captain-kirk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/08/03/matt-damon-as-captain-kirk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/08/03/matt-damon-as-captain-kirk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the rumours say. I just can&#8217;t imagine someone else acting the role of Captain Kirk other than William Shatner. At least we have another Star Trek film to look forward to though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/03/1627232&#038;from=rss">So the rumours say</a>. </p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t imagine someone else acting the role of Captain Kirk other than William Shatner. At least we have another Star Trek film to look forward to though. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/08/03/matt-damon-as-captain-kirk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loach on Newsnight tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/15/loach-on-newsnight-tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/15/loach-on-newsnight-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/15/loach-on-newsnight-tonight/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There should be an interesting discussion on Newsnight tonight when their culture correspondent Stephen Smith interviews Ken Loach, the Palm D&#8217;Or winner for the Wind that Shakes the Barley. He hits back at the &#8220;headbangers&#8221; who&#8217;ve accused him of hating his country and tells Newsnight he is proud to be British.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should be an interesting discussion on <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/default.stm">Newsnight</a> tonight when their culture correspondent Stephen Smith interviews Ken Loach, the Palm D&#8217;Or winner for the Wind that Shakes the Barley. He hits back at the &#8220;headbangers&#8221; who&#8217;ve accused him of hating his country and tells Newsnight he is proud to be British. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/15/loach-on-newsnight-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The devil is in the detail</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/11/the-devil-is-in-the-detail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/11/the-devil-is-in-the-detail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/11/the-devil-is-in-the-detail/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Omen IMDB Year: 2006 Director: John Moore Length: 2hours Category: Drama Media: Film Rating: 0 out of 5 So I went to see the remake of the 1976 classic, The Omen. I have always liked the original, and have seen it a number of times. The remake is an almost verbatim remake, with little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='hreview x-wpsb-review-movie'>
<div>
<h3 class='item fn'>The Omen</h3>
<p>
<div><img src="http://ia.imdb.com/media/imdb/01/I/45/17/20/10m.jpg"/></div>
</p>
<p><a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0466909/'>IMDB</a></p>
<p><b>Year</b>: 2006</p>
<p><b>Director</b>: John Moore</p>
<p><b>Length</b>: 2hours</p>
<p><b>Category</b>: Drama</p>
<p><b>Media</b>: Film</p>
</p></div>
<div><b>Rating</b>: <span class="rating">0</span> out of 5
<div class="sb-emptystar"> </div>
<div class="sb-emptystar"> </div>
<div class="sb-emptystar"> </div>
<div class="sb-emptystar"> </div>
<div class="sb-emptystar"> </div>
<div style="clear: left"></div>
</div>
<div class='description'>
<p>So I went to see the remake of the 1976 classic, The Omen. I have always liked the original, and have seen it a number of times. The remake is an almost verbatim remake, with little in the way of additions or improvements. On it&#8217;s own it may have made it, but in comparison to the original, it is a pathetic recreation. It appears much of the script was lifted directly from the original, most especially noticeable in the scene where the photographer and Mr. Thorne are in the abode of the now dead priest. </p>
<p>But my venom is not mainly for the production of a remake, or of the quality of the remake. It is the laziness of the post-production. Did anyone, at all, involved in the making of the film, not actually watch it once if was finished? </p>
<p>You may not believe me, but the gobshites who made this film managed to produce it in a way that meant the microphones are visible in the early scenes. And no, they are not actually meant to be there, they are actually part of the making of the film. At first I thought it was a brief mistake, then it kept happening, until at one point I thought the lead actress was going to get clobbered on the head. As another reviewer notes:</p>
<blockquote><p>When it first appeared I thought&#8230;hmmm are there reporters in this scene or is that just a little flub? No&#8230; the camera pans back, no reporters in sight. Must have just been a mistake. I figured it was a small mistake. But then, it appears in the next scene, and the next scene, and the NEXT scene, and then in almost every single scene from that point on. At one point it almost HIT the actress head while shes sitting on the couch yelling at the nanny to take damien upstairs. It got so bad that you could tell the producers even tried cutting it out of some scenes. Suddenly this dark black fuzzy line appears at the top of the screen attempting to hide the mic. Unfortunatly even the black fuzzy line couldnt keep this thing out of the shot. It dips down below the line many many times. How do you take a horror movie seriously when the microphone is in all the shots??</p></blockquote>
<p>Surely someone spotted this? Surely someone suggested removing the mics with some digital wizardry? </p>
<p>It spoils the entire film, and there were mumbles of questions and disbelief from other people in the cinema. Some even laughed, and I don&#8217;t blame them. There is simply no excuse for it. It&#8217;s lazy and unprofessional, it&#8217;s rule number one of film making &#8211; don&#8217;t let the audience know it&#8217;s actually make-believe.</p>
</div></div>
<p><script type="application/x-subnode; charset=utf-8">
       <!-- the following is structured blog data for machine readers. -->
       <subnode xmlns:data-view="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#" data-view:transformation="http://structuredblogging.org/subnode-to-rdf-interpreter.xsl" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#subnode">
       	    <xml -structured-blog-entry xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns">
       		    <generator id="wpsb-1" type="x-wpsb-post" version="1"/><review type="review/movie"><subject name="The Omen" year="2006" length="2hours" category="drama" media="film" imdburl="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0466909/" director="John Moore" image="http://ia.imdb.com/media/imdb/01/I/45/17/20/10m.jpg"><upc media="dvd"/></subject><rating max="5" min="0">0</rating><description>So I went to see the remake of the 1976 classic, The Omen. I have always liked the original, and have seen it a number of times. The remake is an almost verbatim remake, with little in the way of additions or improvements. On it's own it may have made it, but in comparison to the original, it is a pathetic recreation. It appears much of the script was lifted directly from the original, most especially noticeable in the scene where the photographer and Mr. Thorne are in the abode of the now dead priest. </p>
<p>But my venom is not mainly for the production of a remake, or of the quality of the remake. It is the laziness of the post-production. Did anyone, at all, involved in the making of the film, not actually watch it once if was finished? </p>
<p>You may not believe me, but the gobshites who made this film managed to produce it in a way that meant the microphones are visible in the early scenes. And no, they are not actually meant to be there, they are actually part of the making of the film. At first I thought it was a brief mistake, then it kept happening, until at one point I thought the lead actress was going to get clobbered on the head. As another <a href="http://movies.msn.com/reviews/userreviews.aspx?user=505b3da3-7617-4525-84c4-98e75525bc6b">reviewer notes</a>:</p>
<p>&lt;blockquote&gt;When it first appeared I thought...hmmm are there reporters in this scene or is that just a little flub? No... the camera pans back, no reporters in sight. Must have just been a mistake. I figured it was a small mistake. But then, it appears in the next scene, and the next scene, and the NEXT scene, and then in almost every single scene from that point on. At one point it almost HIT the actress head while shes sitting on the couch yelling at the nanny to take damien upstairs. It got so bad that you could tell the producers even tried cutting it out of some scenes. Suddenly this dark black fuzzy line appears at the top of the screen attempting to hide the mic. Unfortunatly even the black fuzzy line couldnt keep this thing out of the shot. It dips down below the line many many times. How do you take a horror movie seriously when the microphone is in all the shots??&lt;/blockquote&gt;</p>
<p>Surely someone spotted this? Surely someone suggested removing the mics with some digital wizardry? </p>
<p>It spoils the entire film, and there were mumbles of questions and disbelief from other people in the cinema. Some even laughed, and I don't blame them. There is simply no excuse for it. It's lazy and unprofessional, it's rule number one of film making - don't let the audience know it's actually make-believe.</description></review>
       	    </xml>
       </subnode>
       </script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/11/the-devil-is-in-the-detail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United 93</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/07/united-93/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/07/united-93/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 17:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/07/united-93/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to see it today. An emotional rollercoaster, and well worth seeing. But I found Flight 93 to be a better film overall. There are two chief differences between the two films. First, Flight 93 shows the people at the other end of the phone. We get to see a wife&#8217;s or mother&#8217;s reaction [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to <a href="http://www.united93movie.com/">see it</a> today. An emotional rollercoaster, and well worth seeing. </p>
<p>But I found <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0481522/">Flight 93</a> to be a better film overall. There are two chief differences between the two films. </p>
<p>First, Flight 93 shows the people at the other end of the phone. We get to see a wife&#8217;s or mother&#8217;s reaction to their loved ones calling them. There are protracted heart wrenching conversations between families, during the course of the hijacking. This makes Flight 93 a far more emotional experience. Much of the film is devoted to these phone calls. </p>
<p>Second, Flight 93 showed very little military reaction. The film instead centered on the passengers and the hijackers. No scenes of the planes hitting the WTC, only word coming through on the phones. The early parts of United are almost entirely devoted to air traffic control and NORAD reactions. </p>
<p>Two different approaches to tell the same overall story, I found Flight 93 to be the better of the two. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/06/07/united-93/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>X-Men 3</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/05/29/x-men-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/05/29/x-men-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 01:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/05/29/x-men-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cian didn&#8217;t like it, but given the comments, it seems he didn&#8217;t stay until the end of the credits to see the last scene. I have to say I did rather like it as special-effects extravaganzas go, especially since almost none of the filming was done in San Francisco, and yet almost the whole film [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://leavinghopejournalism.blogspot.com/2006/05/x-men-3-last-stand.html">Cian didn&#8217;t like it</a>, but given the comments, it seems he didn&#8217;t stay until the end of the credits to see the last scene.</p>
<p>I have to say I did rather like it as special-effects extravaganzas go, especially since <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/05/21/MNGFQIVNA91.DTL">almost none of the filming was done in San Francisco</a>, and yet almost the whole film is based there. </p>
<p>If you do go to see it, do stay until the end of the credits, it is a rather critical scene. </p>
<p>Cian has incidentally moved to a new home over at <a href="http://www.cianboland.com/">cianboland.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/05/29/x-men-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United 93</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/05/15/flight-93/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/05/15/flight-93/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 08:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/05/15/flight-93/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant to blog this earlier, but has anyone else seen United 93? I haven&#8217;t seen much discussion of it in the Irish blogosphere. I actually didn&#8217;t realise it was released straight to DVD last week until I spotted it in Xtra-vision, whereupon I instantly rented it. And I have to concurr with the reviews [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to blog this earlier, but has anyone else seen <a href="http://www.flight93.net/">United 93</a>? I haven&#8217;t seen much discussion of it in the Irish blogosphere. </p>
<p>I actually didn&#8217;t realise it was released straight to DVD last week until I spotted it in Xtra-vision, whereupon I instantly rented it. </p>
<p>And I have to concurr with the reviews I have read from bloggers in the States. It is a film done with taste and and with a rather unnatural sense of familiarity. At many points you do feel like one of the passengers, and there appeared to be various devices used by the director to hook the viewer into associating with the film. Anyone who has travelled on planes will find themselves questioning themselves, and what they would do in that position. </p>
<p>In some ways it is like the discussion of the Falling Man picture earlier. It is <em>compelling</em> to watch.</p>
<p>At times it is difficult to watch the phone calls between passengers and their families, but I recommend United 93 nonetheless. </p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Thanks Simon, got mixed up between the website URL and the film title. But it is the one that was just released in the US. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/05/15/flight-93/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C for Cookie</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/29/c-for-cookie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/29/c-for-cookie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/29/c-for-cookie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for yet another video, but this is just too funny to pass up. Click here. via Boing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for yet another video, but this is just too funny to pass up.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9rzMaAucI4&#038;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Egavinsblog%2Ecom%2F"><br />
Click here</a>.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/28/video_c_for_cookie_s.html">Boing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/29/c-for-cookie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simpsons Movie Trailer</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/03/2707/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/03/2707/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 08:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/03/2707/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QT3phlfyoFY"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QT3phlfyoFY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2006/04/03/2707/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Cruise doesn&#8217;t have a hissy fit</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/06/20/tom-cruise-doesnt-have-a-hissy-fit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/06/20/tom-cruise-doesnt-have-a-hissy-fit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=2233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Tom Cruise actually comes across looking like a sensible human being. The video of it actually makes the guy from Channel 4 look like a plonker, by virtue of the fact that Cruise takes a completely reasonable position.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Tom Cruise actually comes across looking <a href="http://www.tampabays10.com/video/player.aspx?aid=18920&#038;sid=15047&#038;bw=hi">like a sensible human being</a>. The video of it actually makes the guy from <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4107922.stm">Channel 4 look like a plonker</a>, by virtue of the fact that Cruise takes a completely reasonable position. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/06/20/tom-cruise-doesnt-have-a-hissy-fit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Cruise on Oprah</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/06/02/tom-cruise-on-oprah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/06/02/tom-cruise-on-oprah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 01:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=2203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is he on cocaine, drunk or just plain crazy? Update, June 17, 2005: The video link appears not to be working now, so try this one instead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nationalwatercooler.com/tomono.mov">Is he on cocaine, drunk or just plain crazy</a>?</p>
<p><strong>Update, June 17, 2005:</strong> The video link appears not to be working now, so try <a href="http://www.tvgasm.com/archives/miscellaneous_tv/000824.php">this one</a> instead. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/06/02/tom-cruise-on-oprah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://nationalwatercooler.com/tomono.mov" length="9108289" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kingdom of Heaven</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/05/04/kingdom-of-heaven/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/05/04/kingdom-of-heaven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 23:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=2134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#8217;t sound like a great one, but then what do I expect from Scott? Anyone else going to catch it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.intheagora.com/archives/2005/05/kingdom_of_heav.html">Doesn&#8217;t sound like a great one</a>, but then what do I expect from Scott? Anyone else going to catch it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/05/04/kingdom-of-heaven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Irish Cinema Set to Go Digital First</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/03/20/irish-cinema-set-to-go-digital-first/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/03/20/irish-cinema-set-to-go-digital-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=2022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is interesting news. Not only that but it got Slashdotted. I have read about the advent of digital cinema for some time, what amazes me is the sheer scale of the files. Cinemas using the technology will be able to download the latest releases to a computer server via satellite at a lower cost. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/4365875.stm">interesting news</a>. Not only that but it got <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/20/1417233&#038;from=rss">Slashdotted</a>. I have read about the advent of digital cinema for some time, what amazes me is the sheer scale of the files. </p>
<blockquote><p>Cinemas using the technology will be able to download the latest releases to a computer server via satellite at a lower cost.</p></blockquote>
<p>That would have to be one quick connection, I think these films are really really big files.  </p>
<p>I will be glad to see the back of flickers and scratches on the reels. Now if only someone would invent something for getting people not to talk during a film.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/03/20/irish-cinema-set-to-go-digital-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Life Aquatic</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/02/24/the-life-aquatic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/02/24/the-life-aquatic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=1970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I forgot to give some kind of review of The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou. There&#8217;s little I can add to the reviews around the net, besides that I thoroughly enjoyed it, it was full of dark humour, quirky events, and some quite memorable scenes &#8211; I think some of the reviews don&#8217;t do it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to give some kind of review of The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou. There&#8217;s little I can add <a href="http://www.google.com/reviews?cid=bc7e99f042f2bb4c&#038;fq=movie:+life+aquatic">to the reviews</a> around the net, besides that I thoroughly enjoyed it, it was full of dark humour, quirky events, and some quite memorable scenes &#8211; I think some of the reviews don&#8217;t do it justice. Bill Murray was flawless in the role of Steve Zissou, and his dry wit had me laughing out loud at times. Definately worth a look, as long as you remember it is a certain type of humour, similar to its predecessor, the Royal Tenenbaums. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2005/02/24/the-life-aquatic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moore&#8217;s documentary allies keep up fire</title>
		<link>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2004/08/11/moores-documentary-allies-keep-up-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2004/08/11/moores-documentary-allies-keep-up-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Sheridan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavinsblog.com/?p=1461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of new films coming out. I wonder which ones I will go see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/533276.html">new films coming out</a>. I wonder which ones I will go see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gavinsblog.com/2004/08/11/moores-documentary-allies-keep-up-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

